Thursday, 18 June 2009
The Ghost of Guthrie
Almost eight months after this story first came to light, the Sydney Morning Herald has finally got some headlines raging along about the recasting controversy around Ruben Guthrie.
"Criticism is mounting against the replacement of four actors in the hit play Ruben Guthrie, with well-known industry figures slamming Company B's decision," writes Louise Schwartzkoff in today's Herald.
"A revised version of the play about Australia's drinking culture has received glowing reviews at the Belvoir St Theatre. But it is running without the actors Christopher Stollery, Tracy Mann, Lex Marinos and Samantha Reed, who worked for two months with no salary to launch the original independent show at Belvoir's downstairs theatre."
"The actors earned a small cut of the box-office takings."
First writing about this in March, I asked the question about what the ethics are around co-op theatre making good? Do producers and directors have any responsibility to actors who have not only sacrificed their time and creativity but also performed to critical acclaim? Or is it all fair in love and war?
It is something that needs to be addressed rather quickly... before the next occurrence of it happens - which could be sooner rather than later.
It's becoming quickly obvious that Belvoir Street's Downstairs Theatre is all but in name (and wages) a professional theatre gig. A quick look at their program this year and you see a couple of stars lining up alongside professional theatre practitioners - not to mention full-time Company B staff also getting in on the act.
Along with much of the 'independent' theatre sector in Sydney, it is now quite out of reach to your average emerging artist (which gives rise to the other issue around emerging artists starting to find their own spaces and avoiding the rigmarole of getting creative approval for your work - but that's for another post).
But the key to unlocking the problem Company B has found themselves in lies in this simple line in today's story; "The actors earned a small cut of the box-office takings."
I think it might be time to start coughing up MEAA wages for any shows that may ascend up the Belvoir Street Theatre stairs. You can get a pretty good idea which shows they will be. Then actors won't feel half as pissed off if they don't go with it and it'll honour the professional nature of the programming.
*** Please be aware that I have taken the anonymous comment function off this blog. If you have something to say, be proud and put your name to it.
Posted by sydney arts journo at 11:45 AM
Labels: Arts Funding, Company B, Independent Theatre, News
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Good to see you back! I wonder about Wayne Blair - shouldn't he as director have stuck by his original cast. Bad Boy!!! Kit
While I understand all of the effort and sacrifice put into the downstairs season of Ruben Guthrie, I don't think Company B were buying the independent show and taking it upstairs. Rather, didn't Belvoir just see something in the independent work that could be revisioned on the mainstage? And isn't that essentially what mainstage theatre companies do? ie. choose and produce shows for their season. largely on their terms? It just so happens this particular show was in the minds of Belvoir because it was performed downstairs. If Belvoir wanted to buy the downstairs production, actors and all, wouldn't they just have done that?
I think it's really important that Australian theatre can have pathways from independent stages to mainstages. While I don't think it's the goal of every indie show to go mainstage, I think it suited this particular work. Australian theatre needs development, space, future, funding - haven't Company B just given Ruben Guthrie a future?
Perhaps it's just missed communication with the actors?? Contracts might help.
It is a really interesting question to consider what actors are owed for their hard slog in co-op. However I think it's dangerous territory if mainstage companies become liable for the risks taken in independent theatre. Ali G
Post a Comment