Wednesday, 25 July 2007

SMH goes for the cynical approach

The Sydney Morning Herald decided to portray last night's excellent discussion about the creative future of Sydney as a bit pie in the sky today.

"In 2030 postcards of Sydney will feature the streets of Marrickville, Darlinghurst and Cabramatta as well as the Opera House," Ben Cubby's page 7 story started.

"Poker machines will be turfed out of pubs, painters will sell their work tax free and stockbrokers will be sent by their bosses to study fine arts instead of business administration," Cubby wrote.

It's such a shame that just to grab a bit of headline they had to go for the over written first paragraphs. If you had been there, you would have realised that the event was so much more than the asides that the Herald has decided would make a better story opening. It all ends up making the arts community, AGAIN, look like idealistic fools.

The Daily Telegraph* ran a page 3 news item that centred around a major theme of the evening - that of gambling and poker machines.

"Sydney is doomed to be a cultural wasteland because poker machines and prohibitive licensing fees are killing our culture, Belvoir St theatre boss Neil Armfield said last night," Simon Ferguson, Arts Editor wrote.

"In a deliberate attack which drew gasps and applause from a packed Town Hall conference," Ferguson went on. "Mr Armfield said Melbourne had a bright artistic future while Sydney's was in doubt, thanks to the State Government's reliance on gambling and licensing revenue."

Ferguson went on to quote Armfield - "'The government feeds on our city's addiction to gambling like a dealer feeds on a junkie's addiction to smack,' he said, slating home the blame for this to "the pubs, clubs and their unholy alliance with the NSW ALP'."

Now, THAT was one of many serious ends of the evening. Ends which proposed serious recommendations to the community and to the Lord Mayor to sort out our creative future. It was not, as the Herald reported an event where 'solutions and detail were perhaps a little thin on the ground'.

Here are just some of the recommendations made last night;

  • an audit of all abandoned buildings in the city centre with a view to designating some of them for the use of arts communities,
  • a stop to further arts infrastructure funding which should now be directed towards the development of artists themselves,
  • advise to introduce some protections for artist communities that already exist in the city centre,
  • an investment in the training of arts educators with a view to stand as the best arts training ground for our neighbours,
  • a review of liquor and gambling laws to allow musicians back into pubs,
  • proposals to use more public spaces cleverly so that art and the urban landscape can co-exist more,
  • proposal to allow buskers back onto the streets of Sydney,
  • the advocacy by government to business to promote the funding of events that aren't necessarily multi-million dollar events,
  • advise to arts communities to communicate better with politicians,
  • and (ironically) a plea to the media to start profiling the arts more positively.
Solutions thin on the ground indeed!

There was also a call last night for an advocate for the arts and artists to be a bit more public, with most pointing to the Lord Mayor. I think, however, Neil, that you have just promoted yourself.


*I write reviews for The Daily Telegraph, so could be accused of bias... but then again, I have been rabbiting on about the quality of arts journalism in the Herald for a while now.


Image: The now defunct artist community at Lanfranchi's.

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

Glad you are feeling better Nicholas. Just a query--I understand your predecessor at the Tele, Diana Simmons, now has a web site theatre page. Do you have any idea how to access it? I can't find it through google

Nicholas Pickard said...

Hi anonymous... Diana worked at the Sunday Telegraph and now runs the website http://www.stagenoise.com/

Hope that helps...

Anonymous said...

Found it--many thanks. By the way, any thoughts on why such an experienced pro as Peter Cousins could have blown it so catastrophically with his decision to cut Sondheim and Furth and not tell the audience? It beggars belief.

Nicholas Pickard said...

Yes, I must admit to being a bit perplexed by the whole affair as well. (There is a big apology printed in today's SMH by the way.)

It appears that the first mistake was not having any understudy - which I find astonishing, especially for the middle of winter. And then to over-ride the director on a creative decision was the second mistake.

I interview Peter a month ago, and he is the loveliest and most passionate man. I really admire what he is trying to do.

At the end of the day, however, i think this will just blow over... and if anything, it gives them some fantastic publicity. They're in the public's conscious now!

Anonymous said...

Yes I agree he seems like a lovely man and should be applauded for starting Kookaburra--but madness to think you can charge full prices for a musical at the Theatre Royal and not have at least one "swing" for the males and one for the females. You either send someone on with the book or cancel--never ever do you corrupt the work of the director and creatives in order to keep the box office receipts. Gale Edwards must be ballistic with rage. As you say, let's hope it blows over, but after the strange choice of "Pippin" to open, and now this, it's a most unfortunate beginning. The apology in the paper was, I read, what Sondheim's lawyers demanded or else they would close the show. A mess.

Anonymous said...

Just read Neil Armfield's speech in Saturday's herald. Wonderful! And how brave of Neil to implicate the ALP as well as the gambling/liquor "industries' (or should that be underworld?) in the killing off of small venues in which music and performance can flourish. A national disgrace.