Sydney Morning Herald journalist David Marr gave a speech in 2005 entitled Theatre Under Howard.
Delivered as the Philip Parsons Memorial Lecture, the event has become a highlight calendar event of Sydney's theatre community. It is a time to open up the umbrella of our industry and to take stock of where we sit amongst our society.
Central to his argument was a stunning illustration of the way that the Liberal Party see the arts as infrastructure.
"In John Howard’s Australia, libraries, museums, theatres and orchestras are on the same list as ports and roads and hospitals – traditional institutions, and necessary parts of the civic fabric."

Marr recalled the revolt of government back benchers over the proposed elimination of state symphony orchestra's as a beautiful example of how much government MP's stick up for arts as infrastructure. The Arts Minister of the time, Rod Kemp, was given a report by James Strong, now Australia Council Chair. It called for the reduction in state orchestra's and the back bench were united by outrage and the suggestion swiftly buried.
But as Marr points out: "To understand what’s happened under Howard to the arts in general and theatre in particular – the odd mix of generosity and meanness, celebration and indifference, abuse and support – it’s best to keep in mind the lessons learnt in the kerfuffle over the orchestras: that the bedrock arts policy of the Howard government is not support for the arts – it’s support for arts institutions. Big, traditional institutions."
Immediately this brings to mind all the Major Performing Arts organisations with their big share of the arts funding pie. State orchestra's, theatre companies, galleries, museums and opera companies.
The Liberal Party-arts-as-institution idea is clearly starting to fall apart at the seams. In The West Australian this week, an article exposed the efforts of Western Australian ballet dancers to go on strike. This astonishing news that you would think would only come out of Europe didn't really make headlines in the east. Essentially, junior dancers were asking for a pay rise from their $674 per week pay packet and senior dancers from their $822 pay packet.
This is the oldest ballet company in Australia and a true pinnacle of the Howard government's institutional arts policy. And WA Ballet would love to pay their dancers more. But they simply can't.
Where does this leave the emerging artist?
Certainly these companies do what they fiscally can to keep turning over the omelette of their creativity, but that is certainly not enough to allow the great fabric of artists harness their skills. They are lucky to pay the people already on the payroll, let alone see new and adventurous artists discover new forms or methods.
As a bi-product emerging artists, particularly in Sydney, rely on underground channels, alternative audiences, cobwebs and dust to spread their wings, to fly from the coup, to create their own individual nest of their expression.
What the Federal Government's half sighted policy does is treat the emerging artist as an after thought in the development of the arts in this country.
Which is why the closure of three important Sydney venues this month is a catastrophe.
The first is Lanfranchi's in the inner city which has for the last five years "been a dedicated studio and performance space for a diverse collective of musicians, visual, sound and new media artists, as well as writers, journalists, arts workers and music publishers".
The second is a dance rehearsal studio in Enmore known as the Arts Space. A venue for the creation of new dance, theatre and music. A place for collaboration and creativity, it is yet another victim to the gentrification of the inner city as developers use their persuasive powers over councils.
The third is an underground jazz and music venue in Surry Hills which was shut down by the local council over a zoning issue.
This first thing that Government bodies do is argue with one another over whose problem it is. That it is either a local problem or a state problem of a federal problem... and on and on and on.
They then attempt to justify the closure and argue that with the elimination of these venues, funding will then go into other institutionalised arts spaces. But with the creation of new institutions, marketing and audience numbers begin to dictate method and curatorship. Neither of which have been well known in the history of the arts as being the originators of creativity.
You won't see this news in the Sydney Morning Herald or the ABC. It's far too peripheral.
But that's the important point. It's the periphery that feeds the centre and if we discard it, the centre will be the ones to lose out in the end.
A more concerted effort to protect the increasingly rare and precious space on the periphery needs to be central of any arts policy - local, state or federally.
Image: Bunny and her hula hoops at Lanfranchi's
Photo by: Alex Davies